MFGG - Mario Fan Games Galaxy

Super Mario Bros: Hello

By: Hello
A great platformer made by Hello.

Completion: Full Game	Genre: Platform
Franchise: Mario

Update History


11/27/06	Mistake. :(

Add submission to your favorites

Report This Submission

	Created:	Aug 29 2006, 7:06 PM
	Updated:	Nov 27 2006, 1:41 AM
	File Size:	4.63MB
	Views:	21712
	Downloads:	5514
	Plays:	0
	Favorites:	0
Download!

Reviews

Author	Summary	Score
Mors	It's glitchy, it's not very well designed, and it's as uninteresting as its name.	2 / 10
Treeki	Could have been improved in EVERY area. This is a waste of time to play. Go somewhere else, other games are miles better.	1 / 10
King Piranha Plant	ANOTHER Trisoft game. Not surprising or original, but possibly enjoyable. I don't reccomend it, but download if you wish. -Keep Creating, Keep Playing.-	4 / 10
Flub	I have made a reveiw of this game before, but SonicProject reminded me of somthing: I was reviewing the game by how hard Hello worked on the game (I expect that he didn't work to hard) and not on the fun of the game. So I have made the reveiw again. Unfourtanly, that doesn't effect the final score too much. While the game may of been average when it came too the graphics and sound, it really wasn't fun.Hello: I highly suggest you start making your own engine, if you could figure out GM than you will be able to create bug-free things of your own. I'd be willing to help.	4 / 10
Pablo	A great platform game,but too similar to SMB 3 and with some defects. You will play it only 1, max 2 times. SMB:H could have been much better.	6 / 10
Average Score		3.4 / 10

Add Review

Comments

	Ultramario Aug 30 2006, 10:56 AM
BETTER DESCRIPTION! PLEASE! AND GET A REAL ENGINE! STOP USING THAT TRISOFT BUGGY CRAP!


	Red9378 Aug 30 2006, 11:16 AM
Can you (Hello) at least I don't know, improve everything? Try the engine description ultramario said before.


	~~jcgurango~~ Aug 30 2006, 11:22 AM
I mean what do you mean "A great platformer made by Hello." LIKE ULTRAMARIO said BETTER DESCRIPTION


	~~jcgurango~~ Aug 30 2006, 11:34 AM
How do you get out if you get stuck on the wall Get a BUG-FIX


	Ultramario Aug 30 2006, 11:58 AM
Quote (jcgurango on Aug 30 2006, 2:34 PM) Get a BUG-FIX ...AND A LOT!!


	Lazor-d Aug 30 2006, 12:28 PM
You mean to say this is another Trisoft Engine game? Why bother, the engine is terrible and full of collision bugs. TRISOFT ENGINE SUCKS.


	ISA56 Aug 30 2006, 2:48 PM
Quote (Lazor-d on Aug 30 2006, 12:28 PM) You mean to say this is another Trisoft Engine game? Why bother, the engine is terrible and full of collision bugs. TRISOFT ENGINE SUCKS. Ya got that right. Will somebody PLEASE make a better GM Platform Engine, so people won't have to use this?


	Littlink Aug 30 2006, 4:13 PM
I would (and I can) but I'm not going to have my engine cloned 15647323654 times.


	tashan Aug 30 2006, 4:19 PM
Quote (Littlink on Aug 30 2006, 4:13 PM) I would (and I can) but I'm not going to have my engine cloned 15647323654 times. lol


	Explosive Shroom Aug 30 2006, 7:08 PM
Hello, your games are consistently minor variations on the Trisoft engine. Try either making your own engine or come up with a way to make other people's engine's original. As it is, it's not bad, but it's not really anything special either.


	madyoshi Aug 30 2006, 8:22 PM
plese dont bost in your own description


	Dr. Mario Aug 30 2006, 9:29 PM
gahh!!!another game with trisofts engine?! if im gonna submit a game I MAKE MY OWN ENGINE not grab the simplest engine and abuse it again and again and again.


	King Piranha Plant Aug 30 2006, 9:33 PM
What everyone else said. 8D


	Hello Aug 31 2006, 12:51 AM
It's a good game. :(


	King Piranha Plant Aug 31 2006, 12:54 AM
Quote (Hello on Aug 31 2006, 12:51 AM) It's a good game. :( It's definetely a good try, but you ought to make your own engine. Trisoft's sucks. I reviewed it, so you got yourself a second review.


	Ultramario Aug 31 2006, 5:06 AM
Quote (Hello on Aug 31 2006, 3:51 AM) It's a good game. :( Who cares about your opinion! ...and never do that kind of description. People just get mad about it.


	Pedigree Aug 31 2006, 3:50 PM
Quote (ultramario on Aug 30 2006, 9:06 PM) Who cares about your opinion! ultramario stop being so god damn ignorant about the damn Trisoft Engine. That is no reason to troll a comment page. And what right do you have to tell other people to stuff their opinion when you're shoving yours down their throats? Take a chill pill. By the way, if you people can do SO much better than the Trisoft Engine, why the hell aren't you? At least Tri was nice enough to offer his assistance in some way to Game Maker users. I don't see any of you critics doing that.


	Ultramario Aug 31 2006, 4:11 PM
Quote (SonicProject on Aug 31 2006, 6:50 PM) ultramario stop being so god damn ignorant about the damn Trisoft Engine. Can't you see how many people agree with me!


	Pedigree Aug 31 2006, 4:15 PM
Quote (ultramario on Aug 31 2006, 8:11 AM) Can't you see how many people agree with me! Do I care how many people agree with you? You're all spamming every game that uses the engine over it. Yet not one of you bothered to state your issues on the Trisoft Engine comment page. Common sense dictates taking your problems to the source. Not attacking everyone who uses the engine.


	Ultramario Aug 31 2006, 4:29 PM
I'm just tired of people using it over and over again without making it any better and lets speak no further of the damn subject!!


	Pedigree Aug 31 2006, 4:30 PM
The bugs aren't THAT bad. However, the fireflower is useless because Mario shoots it in random directions and I found issues with floor collision throughout the level. The blue block hill thing at the beginning of the level and the bridge later on in the level to be specific. Other than that, the game is pretty playable. Though I really don't know how to complete the first level... I saw plenty of additions that were not in the Trisoft Engine to convince me that you did more than copy it. Just fix up some things and you've got a decent game. ultramario: Whether you're tired of it or not, next time I see you spamming about the Trisoft engine and being downright nasty towards authors for using it, I'm reporting you to the site staff.


	Ultramario Aug 31 2006, 4:58 PM
Quote (SonicProject on Aug 31 2006, 7:30 PM) next time I see you spamming about the Trisoft engine and being downright nasty towards authors for using it, I'm reporting you to the site staff. k


	Stixdude Aug 31 2006, 9:12 PM
Quote (lorddarkstar647 on Aug 31 2006, 4:05 PM) ur the one whos spaming. Please stop it, dude. You're seriously giving yourself a bad reputation here.


	Lazor-d Aug 31 2006, 9:40 PM
Bottom Line : Trisoft Engine sucks. I CAN make a better engine, in fact I HAVE made a better engine. However, releasing it to the public is a no. No way.


	ISA56 Aug 31 2006, 11:37 PM
Quote (Lazor-d on Aug 31 2006, 9:40 PM) Bottom Line : Trisoft Engine sucks. I CAN make a better engine, in fact I HAVE made a better engine. However, releasing it to the public is a no. No way. Why is that?


	Hello Sep 1 2006, 12:27 AM
Quote (Lazor-d on Aug 31 2006, 9:40 PM) Bottom Line : Trisoft Engine sucks. I CAN make a better engine, in fact I HAVE made a better engine. However, releasing it to the public is a no. No way. Can you release a .exe to the public?


	Lazor-d Sep 1 2006, 3:09 AM
Nah, you'll probably see it in my next game.


	King Piranha Plant Sep 1 2006, 3:50 AM
Quote (lorddarkstar647 on Aug 31 2006, 8:05 PM) ur the one whos spaming. Shut the hell up, and stop saying rude things about wise members stating their opinions and facts. Sonicproject had a good point.


	Ultramario Sep 1 2006, 8:49 AM
Quote (lorddarkstar647 on Aug 31 2006, 11:05 PM) ur the one whos spaming. We both were spamming! Got it!


	SajmonN Sep 1 2006, 11:44 AM
THIS IS THE MOST ANNYOYING AND GLITCHIEST AND BUGGIEST GAME I EVER PLAYED!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


	Pedigree Sep 1 2006, 5:44 PM
Quote (Lazor-d on Aug 31 2006, 1:40 PM) Bottom Line : Trisoft Engine sucks. I CAN make a better engine, in fact I HAVE made a better engine. However, releasing it to the public is a no. No way. Then I suggest not contributing to the harassment of others for using a resource, practically the only suitable resource for GameMaker available on this site. I really think you should save your "Trisoft engine sucks" comments for the comment page of the Trisoft engine itself. Suggesting that someone make significant improvements to the engine is one thing but we do not need 3 or 4 pages every game with everyone saying "Trisoft sucks". Suggestions and comments relevant to the game itself are what's needed. Honestly, I wouldn't give a damn if I didn't see this kind of bull**** on every page. :/ SajmonN: You haven't played many games then.


	FibS Sep 1 2006, 7:30 PM
The n00bs go flaming one by one, hurrah, hurrah


	~~lorddarkstar647~~ Sep 1 2006, 7:59 PM
Quote (ultramario on Sep 1 2006, 8:49 AM) We both were spamming! Got it! now ur spaming,lmao


	~~lorddarkstar647~~ Sep 1 2006, 8:05 PM
Quote (Stixdude on Aug 31 2006, 9:12 PM) Please stop it, dude. You're seriously giving yourself a bad reputation here. u r.bottom line and the moral of this game, trisoft sucks from im hearing,damnit if you get this then u have halfway a bad taste in good gameing, im saying that the game itself is bad but the engine end of story.


	Pedigree Sep 1 2006, 10:29 PM
Quote (lorddarkstar647 on Sep 1 2006, 12:05 PM) u r.bottom line and the moral of this game, trisoft sucks from im hearing,damnit if you get this then u have halfway a bad taste in good gameing, im saying that the game itself is bad but the engine end of story. None of this makes any sense. I don't think anyone could have "get this" even if they wanted to.


	Stixdude Sep 2 2006, 1:01 AM
The game isn't good, but it isn't bad either. The only thing I can tell you is you need to make your own Mario engine instead or you can fix the bugs contained in Trisoft's engine.


	Black Squirrel Sep 2 2006, 10:00 AM
My god, I've removed a lot of stupid and unneccessary comments here. Keep discussion about Super Mario Bros: Hello only please, not complaining about an open-source engine that Tri released to you just to be nice. If you hate this engine so much don't use it, and instead maybe go back to your bug-ridden unplayable edits of the GameMaker example that people seem to have a strong attraction too. Or, if you claim to be able to make better engines, give constructive critisism or advice on how Hello and Tri can improve their games instead of complaining about how it "fails in comparison to yours". On a lighter note, I think Tri's engine is of very good quality, and although not perfect, incredibly useful to those who are still pretty new to GameMaker. I also think that SMBH is a good example on how the engine can be improved in some places to make a good game. Good Job!


	Flub Sep 2 2006, 8:39 PM
Quote (Black Squirrel on Sep 2 2006, 11:00 AM) My god, I've removed a lot of stupid and unneccessary comments here. Keep discussion about Super Mario Bros: Hello only please, not complaining about an open-source engine that Tri released to you just to be nice. If you hate this engine so much don't use it, and instead maybe go back to your bug-ridden unplayable edits of the GameMaker example that people seem to have a strong attraction too. Or, if you claim to be able to make better engines, give constructive critisism or advice on how Hello and Tri can improve their games instead of complaining about how it "fails in comparison to yours". On a lighter note, I think Tri's engine is of very good quality, and although not perfect, incredibly useful to those who are still pretty new to GameMaker. I also think that SMBH is a good example on how the engine can be improved in some places to make a good game. Good Job! Which is why I changed my reveiw.


	tonyle411 Sep 4 2006, 1:16 AM
um... the bridge in level one you can fall easily?!?!


	DarkMarioKing Sep 4 2006, 10:51 PM
i like it,its cool :P

Pages: (2) 1 2 | Last Unread