Logo Image





Reviews


Review Information
Game Reviewed Super Mario Block Puzzle Game, by MegaTailzChao
Review Author Gato
Created Aug 19 2007, 9:17 PM

General Commentary and Game Overview
Great game, at first it starts good, but in the 2 world first levels don't use blocks, just enemies though...=/
 
Pros I like the concept of this game...and the method of grabing and throwing things.
Makes me use logic...unlike any other Mario fangames I have played before.
 
Cons -when you turn around, mario moves, to me that shouldn't happen because its hard to move in small spaces sometimes
 
Impressions
Gameplay
9 / 10
Loved the gameplay...slight unoticable glitches but its still very good.
 
Graphics
8 / 10
I love the graphics...but I would recommend different bosses per world...=/
 
Sound
9 / 10
Pokemon D/P sound track is the way to go... nobody hates it unless its been overused by other fangames.
 
Replay
8 / 10
R for a restart button was a good idea.
In case you get stumped with the puzzle you could just restart the level.
 
Final Words
9 / 10
I wanna see the final version of this game.

Comments
Grant Dec 26 2007, 7:04 PM
I'm sorry to say this about a review written by a friend, but this review in my opinion is so low-quality that I'm amazed it got accepted.

Reviews, I believe, should:

* Have more than one or two sentences per section (generally speaking at least)
* Actually describe the good and bad points of each aspect so as to make it clear why they got the scores they got, rather than just saying "I loved the graphics/gameplay" or "the graphics/gameplay is good/great"
* Have something in the Replay section that actually has to do with replay value (i.e., how much a player will likely want to come back to play the game again)
* In general not appear like they were written in just 10-15 minutes - like all submissions, reviews should show some effort

All in all, if I had not played this game already, I would have come out of reading this review knowing not very much at all of importance about the game. I don't like to sound harsh, but think of this as advice for future reviews.
 
Gato Jan 6 2008, 4:18 AM
Quote (Grant on Dec 26 2007, 7:04 PM)
I'm sorry to say this about a review written by a friend, but this review in my opinion is so low-quality that I'm amazed it got accepted.

Reviews, I believe, should:

* Have more than one or two sentences per section (generally speaking at least)
* Actually describe the good and bad points of each aspect so as to make it clear why they got the scores they got, rather than just saying "I loved the graphics/gameplay" or "the graphics/gameplay is good/great"
* Have something in the Replay section that actually has to do with replay value (i.e., how much a player will likely want to come back to play the game again)
* In general not appear like they were written in just 10-15 minutes - like all submissions, reviews should show some effort

All in all, if I had not played this game already, I would have come out of reading this review knowing not very much at all of importance about the game. I don't like to sound harsh, but think of this as advice for future reviews.

yeah, I'll try to make better reviews, cause I'm still a starter at this.
 
Pages: (1) 1 | Last Unread